AI is running
across your operations.
IT can see none of it.
- Employees are using AI tools on regulated operational workflows — prior authorizations, claims processing, loan applications, client communications — with no IT visibility, no audit trail, and no controls your compliance team can inspect or enforce.
- The risk is not that employees are using AI. The risk is that AI is acting on your behalf, on your data, in your regulated workflows — without the governance infrastructure that enterprise deployment requires.
- The enterprise response is not to block AI adoption. It is to deploy an AI layer that your IT and compliance teams can actually govern — server-side, auditable, with defined authority boundaries and suspension controls.
- Every connection between your AI client and PLRX agents runs through MCP — an open standard with full logging, scoped permissions per tenant, and no proprietary dependencies. Every tool call is attributed to an identity and logged to the WORM audit trail. IT has complete visibility. Nothing runs outside the governed layer.
What governed AI deployment
provides that shadow AI cannot.
| Requirement | Shadow AI Reality | PLRX Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail for regulated workflows | No structured record of agent actions on regulated data. Cannot answer a regulator's question about what AI did on a specific transaction. | WORM audit trail on every agent action — queryable by workflow, by date, by agent. Regulatory examination ready from day one. |
| Defined escalation to human judgment | No governance layer. AI acts within the permissions of the user session, without enterprise-defined authority boundaries. | Authority boundaries defined per workflow. The platform enforces what the agent can and cannot do. Human escalation is explicit, not a fallback. |
| Data does not train third-party models | No contractual guarantee. Regulated data may flow into model improvement pipelines without enterprise awareness. | Contractual commitment: customer data never used for model training. Sovereign tenant environment. No data shared with other deployments. |
| Suspension controls | Stop the AI by closing the application. No enterprise-level suspension, no workflow-level halt, no way to stop a specific action mid-execution across the organisation. | Three-level suspension: platform-wide, agent-level, workflow-level. Immediate. Without vendor involvement. Complete record of the state at suspension. |
| BAA and compliance certification | Personal and departmental AI tools typically operate without the enterprise data agreements required for regulated industry deployment. | BAA available before any PHI is processed. HIPAA, SOC 2, and GDPR compliance architectural — not a configuration tier. |
These are the two questions every CIO and compliance officer needs answered before approving any AI deployment on regulated operational workflows. Shadow AI tools cannot answer either. PLRX answers both specifically.
Who can see what the agent did: Every action the agent takes is logged in a WORM audit trail — what it read, what it decided, what it sent, what it received, and when. Retrievable by IT or compliance on demand, without contacting PLRX.
Where the agent stops and a human begins: Defined in the workflow configuration and enforced by the platform. Escalation conditions are explicit, not inferred. The boundary cannot be overridden at runtime by the agent or the user.
The enterprise response to shadow AI proliferation is to deploy a governed alternative — one that delivers the productivity benefit with the governance infrastructure regulated environments actually require. Not to block adoption.
The question is not whether your team will use AI on operational workflows. They already are. The question is whether IT can see it.
PLRX provides the governed, server-side AI layer for enterprise operations — full IT visibility, WORM audit trails, defined authority boundaries, and suspension controls. The productivity benefit your team is already seeking, with the governance your compliance team requires.